I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Последние новости
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36，这一点在Line官方版本下载中也有详细论述
Snakehive Samsung Galaxy S26 Phone Case。业内人士推荐WPS官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
A tribute performance, a special arrangement of No More Tears curated by his wife Sharon Osbourne and fronted by Williams, will close the show on the night.，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
Что думаешь? Оцени!